Özkan S. H. (Yürütücü)
TÜBİTAK Projesi, 2014 - 2015
The purpose of this essay is to explain history
education in multicultural and multi-religious societies. In recent decades,
many countries have become increasingly multicultural, multi-religious,
multi-linguistic, and pluralistic. Thus, history education has gained more
importance in multicultural and multi-religious societies because history has
an important place among these pluralistic societies. Therefore, history is
taught from kindergarten to university, and it is a field of
interest in continuing education centers in every community,
cultural group, and society. A major goal of history
education is to provide all students with learning about their community’s
cultures, within the mainstream culture, and within and across other ethnic
cultures in pluralistic societies.
Key Words: History Education, multiculturalism, multi-religion,
history curriculum
1. Introduction
Political
geographies are always the cause of ethnic, religious, cultural, or political
conflict, and this conflict precedes the flourishing of new cultures,
religions, sects, faiths, and ideologies; a process that seems to be
continuing. Different cultures, faiths, and societies have thrived during the
same political geography throughout history, and this will continue. These
cultures and societies have sometimes remained together and sometimes separate
and remained strong; hence, our world has hosted many cultures, races, and
religions in the historical process. For example, in terms of religion, Islam,
Christianity, Judaism and other religions and faiths mix in seemingly opposite
geographic regions, Asian-European and Eastern-Western, which affected the
Turkish, German, French, English, Greek, Arab, Chinese, as well as other
ethnicities.
New countries were founded and new nations sprung up in the 19th and 20th centuries, or they were created by the desire of foreign powers. Multination societies and countries were, in particular, negatively affected in these centuries[1]. For instance, the French Revolution and its ideologies and nationalism damaged unique multi-ethnic, multi-cultural structures such as the Ottoman and Austria-Hungarian Empires. During this period, especially in the new societies and countries that appeared toward the middle of the 20th century, schools began to use history courses “to build a new nation,” build up the idea of new identity and culture for students[2]. Hence, culture and history are politicized, language is standardized, and new myths are created to establish new national identities. Nationalism tries to implement harmonious politics and culture to convert society politically because society is already culturally aware[3]. Thus, nationalist history has predominated over other versions. In recent decades, in contrast to this situation, multicultural education has gained more importance. Particularly due to rapid changes throughout the world, many countries have become multicultural societies. One of the basic principles of multiculturalism is that it is opposed to homogeneity, uniformity, and the standardization of cultural forms. Multiculturalism is committed to the protection, promotion, and maintenance of ethno-cultural diversity, which in turn, provides opportunities to minorities to preserve, maintain, and express their distinctive cultural form, life styles, and rights[4].
2. Studies in report terms
I. Term...
First term period I collected my research area data
and as I declared first term progress report, and I attended a number of
classes in an undergraduate course during the fall academic year.
3. Research results
Today, to establish a society that has the most needed
characteristics, a new historical idea of nation needs to put a greater focus
on collective advantage. An historical fact cannot be understood correctly if
why it occurred is not explained correctly. In such a case, the benefits of
history are limited as a scientific method. Looked at from this perspective,
learning history is only harmful to people and societies because what it
teaches is untrue, arbitrary, and explained on the basis of fiction, so is not
closely related to the truth[5]. Teachers must be loyal to
historical documents and historical events while teaching them. Without
understanding historical background correctly, we cannot understand why events
occurred and historical conflicts continue among countries, especially
particular societies and communities, for centuries. Historical issues must not
serve as barriers among current societies. In recent decades, politicians have
used history and historical events to set domestic policies, and history has
often become highly politicized. Especially, toward the middle of the 20th
century, national history was the standard in schools. Hence, history has been
a barrier among the societies and communities because of nationalist and
unilateral ideas[6].
Actually, history must help students find meaning in the past and recognize the
need for participation in society or government and responsible
decision-making. Students must know not
only the triumphs of history, but also the failures, the tragedies, and the
humiliations[7].
History and historical
facts, instead being examined in terms of scientific norms, have instead been
assigned various meanings. A teacher of history, for example, uses words’ in a
course that are evidence of personal ideology. Thus, history is commonly
accepted as a faith and values instead something subjected to scientific
methods[8]. This situation is an
obstacle to objectivity with historians adding their ideas and comments
especially when unable to understand other perspectives. Nevertheless, history
has an important place among the other social sciences. Despite these potential
problems, history and history education have gained more and more importance in
multicultural, multi-religious, multi-linguistic, and pluralist societies.
Therefore, history is taught from kindergarten to university, and it is a field of
interest in continuing education centers in every community,
cultural group, and society. Teaching history is negatively affected by
different ideologies and nationalism; in particular, historical accuracy is
negatively affected from multicultural education. If new generations acquire
the ability to investigate more objectively, they can better evaluate
historical accuracy [9]. If individuals know their own history and cultural
background, they tend to be able to understand other cultures more easily. They
can more easily sense and comment on similarities between cultures. Individuals who are not alienated
from their own culture can learn about new cultures and religions without
necessarily assimilating them.
Multiculturalism
means respect for cultural diversity and pluralism among different religions,
societies, histories, and ideas, and it must be used to develop democratic
education and peace in the world[10]. Cultural respect and,
especially, commitment to cultural pluralism, will take us perhaps further than
antiracism in establishing a community in schools. These values involve a
positive regard for others in light of their cultural differences and a
treasuring of the diversity present in school[11]. Therefore, a major goal of history education must be to
establish national and world peace. While history
education seems to be more concerned with ethnic and racial groups in a
multicultural society, it is rightly the central concern of all nations and
societies. If we ask the question–What is the difference or similarity between
cultural or religious groups and racial groups? –there is no simple answer, but
we can distinguish several components. First, members of a cultural group are
do not represent a single race[12]. Members of the same
race, for example, can believe in different religions or sects, or they can all
believe in the same religion. Second, countries who speak the same language may
comprise different cultural groups. Therefore, religion, language, and cultural
facts can either unite or separate people around a single concept.
Curriculum is clearly important to teaching. It may
even be more important to history than to other courses because history is
especially complicated and difficult. Therefore, history curriculum must have
everything to do with content and delivery of instruction, the experience of
learning and teaching, and the structure of the experience by cultural assumption,
institutional policies, and utilization of the school and community resources.
When a curriculum is planned for multicultural and diversity education,
standard lesson and unit plans should be compared with plans that cover the
same traditional curricular content but also attend to issues of
multiculturalism and diversity[13]. History
curriculum must help students to solve global issues and to gain profound
understanding.[14] A history curriculum definitely should not
use terms like “enemy”’ but some countries’ curricula have included this kind
of language. In his study about South Cyprus students, for example, Spyrou
found that they view Turkish people as enemies, invaders, occupiers, and
barbarians, because they think Turks are responsible for every evil that has
occurred in Cyprus. According to Spyrou, this kind of thinking affects
students’ understanding of culture and history, especially when teachers stress
nationalism and “bad Turk” images. Additionally, researchers emphasize that
racism develops in a school, which pushes students to conceptualize events in
terms of enemies[15]. The history curriculum needs to be reformed with
inclusion of curriculum theory and historical inquiry so that bias in
textbooks, media, and other educational materials can be detected easily by
educators, students, and other stakeholders[16].
Also, the curricula of some countries try to conceal historical facts.
Japanese textbooks, for example, hardly mention World War II. According to some
research, there was just one sentence in a particular
book about the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki[17].
National history must not be based on hostility
either. If historical facts are distorted, they have an adverse effect on
society, especially if the facts include entire episodes of history. Most
damaging is when politicians use military, ideological, economical, and
political conflict and problems to construct domestic policy. Because
historical conflicts, which occurred in the
past, serve today’s
political goals in domestic policy, they create barriers among citizens instead
of bringing them closer. Today’s social problems are directly and closely
related to the past. If historians do not use research from past, they will not
find a way to solve these problems[18]. Every society can allege
supremacy in their historical thesis, and, it already has been done, and it
will continue, but multicultural societies must be careful while defending
their own thesis, because they may uncover new hostilities and make enemies of
multicultural societies.
In the history of teaching, teaching an historical
curriculum must be developed in order to understand other cultures and other
nations, especially multicultural and multi-religious societies. Although USA and European
countries have improved their multicultural and multi-religious education
systems, they still have taught dominant culture, religion, faith, and sect in
the schools despite the rapidly changing population over the past few years.
Some cultural and religious groups desire to learn their own history, religion,
and cultures in order to embrace our history and culture these multicultural
and multi-religious societies. These desires will likely continue to increase
these pluralistic societies. Beginning of the 20th century, for
example, Catholics established their own schools and eventually entered the
mainstream culture[19].
Although
American society has remained as multi-religious, multicultural, and
pluralistic society until today, but the American society and government
worries about the transformation of society because illegal immigration has
rapidly increased. According to some researchers, in 1960, the overwhelming
shares of immigrants were of European origin and few were Latin
American/Caribbean or Asian. By 2013, a census survey found half of immigrants
were Latin-American/Caribbean and 27% were Asian, while the European share of
the immigrant population had fallen to a mere 13%. American population will
swell to 37% by 2050, compared with 15% back in 1965. Immigrants now come from
different parts of the world, and they make up a larger share of the American
public. Americans saw immigrants as burdens on society rather than as
strengthening the country through their work. Also, many thought that the
growing number of newcomers would threaten traditional American values and
customs. But slowly, opinions have begun to change over the course of the past
decades. By 2014, a healthy 57% majority had come to the opposite point of
view, saying that immigrants strengthened the country through their hard work;
and just 35% now say that the increasing number of immigrants is threatening
American values[20].
The Council of Europe Committee of Ministers is aware of history education because they made some important decisions to arrange relationships with the members of European countries to discuss history education in the 21st century. Also the Council developed different projects in the direction of their decision[21]. The curriculum of history education that is emphasized in the many European countries should reflect the societies they live in and the time and conditions under which they live. Education for new generation for multicultural societies is an important part of this aim. New generations must be taught to live with diversity, because they are members of a continuously rising global society. Therefore, a major goal of history and social science is to educate the new generation as multicultural societies[22]. Hence races and ethnic groups should enjoy historical and cultural particularities because there is a relationship between past and present.[23]
The history of teaching is expected to him for benefit, first, what is expected it and aim to history education clearly put on,[24] because history usually was seen as a subject to teach a national consciousness and historical heroes to the young generation with the of aim hearkening them to patriotism[25]. At this stage, patriotism has stronger ties in some cultures and countries. For this reason, a history teacher must fervently teach about patriotism in class. Because, according to him, new generations must grow up patriotic. If students don’t learn patriotism they don’t understand their history and culture. At the same time, patriotism contributes to social peace among the societies, especially in multicultural societies. Teachers need to help students understand the distinction between race and ethnicity, and also provide a safe space in which racial identities can be openly acknowledged and racial attitudes forthrightly discussed[26]. Also, a successful history teacher will recognize the inherent strengths and weaknesses of his or her students, their learning styles and their preconceptions about various topics in the curriculum, and adjust the lesson plan accordingly[27].
4. Conclusion and Comments
To conclude, a major goal of history education is to
teach all students their history and knowledge needed to function within their
own community’s history and within the mainstream history. Another major goal
of history education is to teach students cultural, ethnic and historical
alternatives. Another major goal of history education is to reduce the pain and
discrimination that members of some ethnic and racial groups experience because
of their unique racial, physical, and cultural characteristics. Another important goal of history education
is to help individuals from diverse racial, cultural, language, and religious
groups to acquire the knowledge and attitudes of the global community[28].
5.
Outputs (Publications, presentations, etc.)
I wrote two articles about history education in the
multicultural, multi-religious, and pluralistic societies. I want to publish these
articles and attend several conferences next years. In addition to I collected
several materials about multicultural and pluralistic societies. I collected
many archive documents in Southwest Collection Library, too. Texas Tech
University Library has got very rich books collection. I worked in the library.
During my works, I took many copies; scanned several documents, and took many online
documents. I will plan to write several articles, and I will publish a book
these documents. I will attend several conferences within next two years, and
I’ll do the presentation my working areas.
[1]
Semih Aktekin, “Türkiye’de Tarih Eğitimi”, Çok
Kültürlü Avrupa İçin Tarih ve Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi, Harf Eğitim Yayıncılığı,
Ankara, 2009, p. 28.
[2]
H. Millas, “(Türkiye’de) Etnosantrik Tarihçiliğin Pratik Sonuçları”, Tarih Öğretimi ve Ders Kitapları,
edited by Salih Özbaran, Dokuz Eylül Yayınları, Izmir, 1998.
[3]
M. H. Yavuz, “Nationalism and Islam: Yusuf Akcura and Uc Tarz-ı Siyaset”, Journal of Islamic Studies. 4:2,
1993, p. 178.
[4]
Arshi Khan, “The Ottoman Empire: An Oriental Architect of
Multiculturalism”, The Great Ottomans
edited by Kemal Çiçek, Yeni Türkiye Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2000, p. 399.
[5]
Abdullah Saydam, “Öğrenil(e)meyen Asır: Türkiye’de XX. Yüzyıl Tarihinin
Öğretil(e)memesi”, Çok Kültürlü Avrupa İçin
Tarih ve Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi, Harf Eğitim Yayıncılığı, Ankara, 2009, p.
54.
[6]
Matt Donnelly, “Teaching History”, Research
Starters Education (Online Edition), 2008, p. 10.
[7]
Peter Appelbaum, Multicultural and
Diversity Education, Santa Barbara, USA, 2002, p. 81.
[8]
Saydam, Ibid, p. 55.
[9]
Ilker Cırık, “Çok
Kültürlü Eğitim ve Yansımaları”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim
Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education) 34: 27-40 [2008]
[10]
Cırık, Ibid, p. 27-40.
[11]
Lawrance Blum, “Multicultural Education as Values Education”, Harvard Project on Schooling and Children,
Harvard, 1997, p. 19.
[12]
Blum, Ibid, p. 16.
[13]
Peter Appelbaum, Multicultural and
Diversity Education, ABC-CLIO Press, Santa Barbara, 2002, p. 47, 48.
[14] James A. Banks, An
Introduction to Multicultural Education, Pearson Education, Boston, 2008,
p. 4-10.
[15]
Cırık, Ibid, p. 27-40.
[16]
Gloria M. Ameny-Dixon, “Why Multicultural Education is More Important in Higher
Education now Than Ever: A Global Perspective” National Forum, N.P, n.d., Web. July 14th 2010.
[18] Selahattin Turan, John Dewey's Report of 1924 and Hıs
Recommendatıons on the Turkısh Educatıonal System Revısıted, American
Educational Research Association’s Annual Meeting, Chicago, March 24-28, 1997,
p. 11.
[19] Thomas J. La Belle and
Christopher R. Ward, Multiculturalism and
Education: Diversity and Its Impact on School and Society, State University
of New York Press, Albany, 1994, p. 11.
[20] Andrew
Kohut, “50 Years Later, Americans Give Thumps-Up to Immigration Law that Change
the Nation” Latino Lubbock, V. 9,
Issue 3, March 2015, p. 5.
[21]
Saydam, Ibid, p. 47-48.
[22]
Semih Aktekin-Mustafa Öztürk, Çok
Kültürlü Avrupa İçin Tarih ve Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi, Harf Eğitim
Yayıncılığı, Ankara, 2009, s. 6.
[23]
Doğan Gürpınar, Ottoman Imperial
Diplomacy, A political, Social and Cultural History, I.B. Tauris, New York,
2004, p, 18.
[24]
Erdal Aslan, “Neden Tarih Ogretiyoruz” Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,
20(2006), p. 164.
[25]
W. Marsden, The School Textbook: Geography, History and Social
Studies, Woburn Press, London, 2001, p. 34-40.
[26]
Blum, Ibid, p. 16.
[27]
Donnelly, Ibid, p. 6.
[28]
Banks, Ibid, p. 2-5.