EVALUATING THRESHOLD LEVEL UNCERTAINTY IN HYDROLOGICAL DROUGHT THROUGH THE STREAMFLOW DROUGHT INDEX (SDI)


Creative Commons License

Arra A. A., Şişman E.

12th INTERNATIONAL NEW YORK CONFERENCE ON EVOLVING TRENDS IN INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH & PRACTICES, New York, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, 21 - 24 Ağustos 2025, cilt.1, ss.25, (Özet Bildiri)

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Cilt numarası: 1
  • Basıldığı Şehir: New York
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Amerika Birleşik Devletleri
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.25
  • Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

In monitoring drought events and characteristics, the literature reveals that standardized indices often

employ specific threshold levels, such as 0, -0.5, -1.0, -1.5, and -2. Each of these thresholds corresponds

to a certain probability level, statistically defined by the standard deviation of the index. In studies of

meteorological drought, the -1.0 level is commonly used as the threshold between mild and moderate

drought, often serving as the onset indicator of a drought event. For hydrological drought

characterization, thresholds of -0.5 and -1.0 are typically preferred as the initiation levels. At the same

time, in reservoir operations and water management, values of -1.5 and below are occasionally

considered operational thresholds. Since hydrological processes exhibit delayed responses and vary

considerably across regions, determining which threshold level to apply in hydrological drought studies

is even more debatable. Moreover, the use of a single standardized threshold often proves misleading.

The aim of this study is to evaluate statistically critical threshold levels from the perspective of water

resources management and decision-support systems. For this purpose, the Streamflow Drought Index

(SDI) was applied within the Konya Closed Basin at 6- and 12-month time scales, analyzing how

thresholds of 0, -0.5, -1.0, -1.5, and -2.0 influence drought duration and intensity. This approach

examines the extent to which threshold selection is critical for drought characteristics, under what

conditions alternative thresholds are more appropriate, and in which cases a single standard threshold

may lead to misinterpretation. The results demonstrate that threshold selection is crucial in identifying

long-lasting and severe drought events. Findings highlight the necessity of using basin-specific,

purpose-oriented calibrated thresholds in hydrological drought assessments. This study contributes to

the systematic evaluation of threshold-related uncertainties in hydrological drought research, offering

insights applicable to reservoir operations, irrigation planning, and early warning systems.