FUZZY MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION OF HEALTH RESEARCH INVESTMENTS


Creative Commons License

Kahraman C., Suder A., KAYA İ.

TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, vol.20, no.2, pp.210-226, 2014 (SSCI) identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 20 Issue: 2
  • Publication Date: 2014
  • Doi Number: 10.3846/20294913.2013.876560
  • Journal Name: TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY
  • Journal Indexes: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus
  • Page Numbers: pp.210-226
  • Keywords: health research, investment, fuzzy sets, AHP, multiple criteria, MULTIATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING, CARE, RISK, AHP, PRIORITIES, SELECTION, NUMBERS
  • Yıldız Technical University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Health research and investments are expensive, and its explicit social, health and economic impacts are hard to define. There are many challenges and assumptions in defining specific returns on investment in health research. In the literature, there is no common approach to evaluate health research impacts. Single criterion methods are generally used with validated indicators to track overall outcomes or outcomes in a specific health research area. These methods have the ability of considering only one criterion at a time, which is usually the cost of the investment. A multicriteria method is proposed for taking care of many conflicting criteria of health research investments. The difficulty of measuring intangible criteria is captured by the fuzzy set theory. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used for the selection among four possible health research investment alternatives. A sensitivity analysis is made for the changes in the values of various parameters.