Offline Signature Identification and Verification Based on Capsule Representations


Creative Commons License

Gumusbas D., YILDIRIM T.

CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, cilt.20, sa.5, ss.60-67, 2020 (ESCI) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 20 Sayı: 5
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.2478/cait-2020-0040
  • Dergi Adı: CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, Aerospace Database, Communication Abstracts, INSPEC, Metadex, Directory of Open Access Journals, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.60-67
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Capsule Network, Offline Signature Verification, Offline Signature Identification, Convolutional Neural Networks
  • Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Offline signature is one of the frequently used biometric traits in daily life and yet skilled forgeries are posing a great challenge for offline signature verification. To differentiate forgeries, a variety of research has been conducted on hand-crafted feature extraction methods until now. However, these methods have recently been set aside for automatic feature extraction methods such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). Although these CNN-based algorithms often achieve satisfying results, they require either many samples in training or pre-trained network weights. Recently, Capsule Network has been proposed to model with fewer data by using the advantage of convolutional layers for automatic feature extraction. Moreover, feature representations are obtained as vectors instead of scalar activation values in CNN to keep orientation information. Since signature samples per user are limited and feature orientations in signature samples are highly informative, this paper first aims to evaluate the capability of Capsule Network for signature identification tasks on three benchmark databases. Capsule Network achieves 97 96, 94 89, 95 and 91% accuracy on CEDAR, GPDS-100 and MCYT databases for 64x64 and 32x32 resolutions, which are lower than usual, respectively. The second aim of the paper is to generalize the capability of Capsule Network concerning the verification task. Capsule Network achieves average 91, 86, and 89% accuracy on CEDAR, GPDS-100 and MCYT databases for 64x64 resolutions, respectively. Through this evaluation, the capability of Capsule Network is shown for offline verification and identification tasks.