ISE Magazine, vol.46, no.1, pp.1-3, 2014 (Non Peer-Reviewed Journal)
There is
now substantial evidence that pricing and inventory management are intimately
tied. A further inquiry would be ‘What role does the consumer behavior have on
pricing and inventory decisions?’
As consumers
buy a particular product frequently, they develop their own price expectations.
This expectation acts as a benchmark price. Consider a 40 Oz jar of peanut
butter. If you see that it is priced at $10 you immediately have a perception
of it as ‘underpriced’ or ‘overpriced’. If you think that it is expensive, what
would be your ‘loss’ if you were to buy it? Marketing literature provides us
with a concept to model this behavior. Consumers develop a reference price against which an announced price is compared. The
reference price and the announced price jointly affect the demand. Moreover,
the reference price dynamically evolves through time. A firm that announces a
discounted price may increase its revenue in the short term, but this discount
affects its future benefits through the reference price. Therefore the firms
face a trade-off between immediate gains and future benefits. Is this another
conundrum for the inventory manager?
Dr. M.
Güray Güler, now at Karadeniz Technical University, and professors Taner Bilgiç
and Refik Güllü of Boğaziçi University in Istanbul, Turkey address this problem
in their paper: “Joint Inventory and Pricing Decisions with Reference Effects”.
The authors assume that the demand in each period is random and contingent on
the price and the price history, as captured by the reference price. The firm
has to give a pricing decision and determine the inventory level at each period
to maximize its discounted expected profit. The good news is: the replenishment
policy is still an order-up-to policy which is widely used in the practice of
inventory management. However, the optimal order-up-to level now depends on the
reference price as well. For example, if a firm has excessive inventory at the
beginning of the period, it is not at liberty to decrease the price too much
because doing so will decrease the reference price in the future. Based on a computational
study, they show that the firm stocks and charges more as long as the consumers
believe that the product is a good bargain.