Economic Adversity and Voter Turnout: Evidence from Turkish Parliamentary Elections

Kama Masala Ö., Aksoy T., Taştan H.

SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, vol.163, no.2, pp.799-821, 2022 (SSCI) identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 163 Issue: 2
  • Publication Date: 2022
  • Doi Number: 10.1007/s11205-022-02919-4
  • Journal Name: SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH
  • Journal Indexes: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, FRANCIS, IBZ Online, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, ABI/INFORM, Abstracts in Social Gerontology, Business Source Elite, Business Source Premier, CAB Abstracts, Communication & Mass Media Index, EBSCO Education Source, EconLit, Geobase, Index Islamicus, Philosopher's Index, Political Science Complete, Psycinfo, Public Administration Abstracts, Public Affairs Index, Social services abstracts, Sociological abstracts, Veterinary Science Database, Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
  • Page Numbers: pp.799-821
  • Keywords: Voter turnout, Elections, Economic adversity, Turkey, ELECTORAL-PARTICIPATION, INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACIES, IMPACT
  • Yıldız Technical University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between economic adversity and voter participation in Turkish parliamentary elections. We employ a dynamic model of voter turnout using a cross-regional panel dataset covering all parliamentary elections for the 1987-2018 period. In addition to lagged voter turnout to account for persistency in electoral participation, our models include two measures of economic adversity: inflation, and economic growth. Empirical results indicate that inflation has a positive and significant effect on voter turnout, while economic growth is insignificant in all specifications. Moreover, inflation is associated with higher voter turnout in provinces with a denser population, higher urbanization, and more abundant human capital. Regional voter turnout rates tend to persistently support the habit formation argument. Overall, our empirical results are consistent with the mobilization hypothesis, suggesting that adverse economic conditions lead to higher electoral participation by stimulating voters to punish the government.