Probing the chiral magnetic wave with charge-dependent flow measurements in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC


Creative Commons License

Acharya S., Adamová D., Aglieri Rinella G., Agnello M., Agrawal N., Ahammed Z., ...Daha Fazla

Journal of High Energy Physics, cilt.2023, sa.12, 2023 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 2023 Sayı: 12
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/jhep12(2023)067
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of High Energy Physics
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, INSPEC, zbMATH, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Collective Flow, Heavy Ion Experiments, Quark Deconfinement
  • Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The Chiral Magnetic Wave (CMW) phenomenon is essential to provide insights into the strong interaction in QCD, the properties of the quark-gluon plasma, and the topological characteristics of the early universe, offering a deeper understanding of fundamental physics in high-energy collisions. Measurements of the charge-dependent anisotropic flow coefficients are studied in Pb-Pb collisions at center-of-mass energy per nucleon-nucleon collision sNN = 5.02 TeV to probe the CMW. In particular, the slope of the normalized difference in elliptic (v2) and triangular (v3) flow coefficients of positively and negatively charged particles as a function of their event-wise normalized number difference, is reported for inclusive and identified particles. The slope r3Norm is found to be larger than zero and to have a magnitude similar to r2Norm, thus pointing to a large background contribution for these measurements. Furthermore, r2Norm can be described by a blast wave model calculation that incorporates local charge conservation. In addition, using the event shape engineering technique yields a fraction of CMW (fCMW) contribution to this measurement which is compatible with zero. This measurement provides the very first upper limit for fCMW, and in the 10–60% centrality interval it is found to be 26% (38%) at 95% (99.7%) confidence level.