Numerical analysis of the heat transfer and pressure drop of a wavy fin and Kammtail tube condenser: An investigative study


Creative Commons License

Erdem Şahnalı F., Atayılmaz Ş. Ö., Gemici Z.

CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING, cilt.55, ss.1-21, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 55
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.csite.2024.104191
  • Dergi Adı: CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Compendex, INSPEC, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1-21
  • Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The aim of this study was to numerically investigate the factors affecting the air-side performance of an innovative condenser for a domestic refrigerator. Novel condenser with a smooth Kammtail tube form was investigated due to delaying flow separation. For the first time in the literature, the kammtail form was used instead of round or ellipse geometry in a finned tube heat exchanger, and the advantages of this form was demonstrated both experimentally and numerically. This study incorporated design parameters such as air velocity (0.5, 0.7, 1 m/s), number of tube rows (4 or 5), tube arrangement (inline, staggered), fin pitches (5, 7, 10, 5–7, 5–10, 7–10 mm), and fin arrangement (homogeneous or hybrid). The findings indicated that, for identical fin types and fin surface areas, the proposed Kammtail shape of 3 × 6 mm exhibited 19% lower pressure drop and 9% higher heat-transfer coefficient compared to the original circular tube profile. Furthermore, decreasing the fin pitches resulted in a 32.9–97% increase in static pressure drop, while the heat-transfer coefficient decreased by about 4.7–11.7%. The examination of two new designs revealed a marked reduction of 7–20.4% in the static pressure drop, a decline in air flow rate of 30%, an increase in heat transfer of 5.6–12.2%, and a corresponding decrease in the volume of the condenser of 20%. The numerical results of this study are in good agreement with experimental results, with deviations of less than 10%.