TERRITORIALITY AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM THE TURKISH SHIPBREAKING INDUSTRY?


Creative Commons License

Gezer B., Yavan N., Evren Y.

31st APDR Congress – Regional Innovation Ecosystems and Sustainable Development, Porto, Portekiz, 26 - 28 Haziran 2024, ss.180-181, (Özet Bildiri)

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Porto
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Portekiz
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.180-181
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

In economic geography, two different approaches have emerged since 1990s to explain the relationship between

institutions and urban/regional economic development and also effects of institutions on industrial development:

dominant and new. The dominant approach has considered the institutions sometimes as the formal and informal rules

and sometimes organizations or untraded interdependencies (Storper, 1995). However, this view has received various

criticism for failing to conceptualize institutional change and not produce a holistic theory of institutions. On the other

hand, the new approach has claimed that criticisms can be eliminated by abandoning this plurality. The pioneers of this

approach developed an alternative view specific to the discipline in which institutions are considered as behavioral

patterns based on mutual expectations and sanctions (Bathelt and Glückler, 2014). Subsequently, institutional change

has been explained through the typologies of interactions among the building blocks of the institutional context.

Adopting the approach of Bathelt and Glückler (2014), this study aims to understand how institutional change affects the

development of Turkish shipbreaking industry. This industry was established in the 1920s in the Golden Horn (İstanbul)

and moved to Aliağa shipbreaking industrial park in İzmir in the 1980s. Thus, unlike the contributions to the existing

framework, this study assumes that institutional change begins with a bottom-up causality, based on the relocation

history of the industry. To test this assumption, 30 interviews were conducted with different actors. According to the

findings, temporary employment, subcontracting and succession were observed as three institutions that affect the

development of industry. In addition, supporting the argument put forward, it has been found that organizational field-

specific dynamics, that is, bottom-up causality, was effective in the transformation of the temporary employment

institution into the subcontracting institution. Over time, it has been observed that outsourcing, one of the two sub-

typologies of subcontracting, has died this time due to top-down causality triggered by the changes in regulations. The

other sub-typology, insourcing, still exists in some firms today, but it is estimated to die in the future for the same reasons.

Besides all these, introducing that institutions may die over time is another finding that constitutes the original value of

study. Finally, no change has been observed in the succession directed by family logic and it still exists in Aliağa since the

1990s. In conclusion, this study contributes to the conceptualisation of institution and institutional change developed by

Bathelt and Glückler (2014) in the field of institutional economic geography.