Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
IEEE ACCESS, cilt.14, ss.42305-42321, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
Programmatic advertising has transformed digital marketing into an automated ecosystem governed by data, algorithms, and platforms. However, this transformation reproduces the core tensions of data capitalism, including the contradictions between precision and privacy, efficiency and ethics, and innovation and inequality. Grounded in the Paradox Theory framework, this study examines whether programmatic systems inevitably reinforce surveillance capitalism or can evolve toward a more participatory and accountable marketing order that enhances digital resilience. A three-round Delphi study was conducted with 34 senior practitioners representing advertisers, agencies, platforms, regulators, and civil society. The findings reveal eleven structural paradoxes that define the socio-technical dynamics of programmatic advertising. Scenario analysis evaluates nine possible futures along two axes: regulatory intensity and platform dominance. Results indicate that status-quo trajectories strengthen data monopolies, reduce algorithmic transparency, and increase exposure to misinformation and deepfakes. Transformative outcomes become feasible when four institutional conditions coincide: enforceable data commons, multi-effect accounting that includes attention and carbon, auditable algorithms, and open protocols under multi-stakeholder governance. Building on these insights, the study proposes a governance-oriented reframing of the marketing mix, termed Permissions, Participation, Portability, and Purpose (4P 2.0). This framework demonstrates how performance and ethics can reinforce one another, providing a roadmap for policymakers and industry leaders to move programmatic advertising from creative extraction to creative renewal.