Evaluation of UAV Flight Planning Strategies on the Accuracy of Glacier Mapping in Rugged Antarctic Terrains: A Case Study of Horseshoe Island
Turkish Journal of Engineering, cilt.10, sa.4, ss.1803-1814, 2026 (Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 10 Sayı: 4
- Basım Tarihi: 2026
- Doi Numarası: 10.31127/tuje.1935836
- Dergi Adı: Turkish Journal of Engineering
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, Applied Science & Technology Source, Central & Eastern European Academic Source (CEEAS)
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1803-1814
- Anahtar Kelimeler: Antarctica, Fixed-height, Orthophoto, Terrain-follow, UAV photogrammetry
- Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
- Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Beginning with the Industrial Revolution, global climate change, driven by rising average temperatures, has led to the rapid melting of Antarctic glaciers. Monitoring this region is crucial, particularly for future modeling studies. Therefore, conducting accurate, reliable, and rapid measurements in a logistically feasible and cost-effective manner is critically important in rugged environments such as Antarctica. The Ground Sampling Distance (GSD) and positional accuracy of photogrammetric products generated by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry are critical to accurately assessing snow and glacier dynamics. In this context, the study presents accuracy assessments and planning recommendations for various flight plan scenarios in a rugged area with slopes up to 40% and partial snow and glacial cover. The study was conducted on a test site on Horseshoe Island, and the UAV flight missions were performed under two operational modes: (i) terrain-follow and (ii) fixed-height. The flight missions were real-time kinematic (RTK)-supported, however, ground control points (GCPs) were also placed and measured prior to the flights. The images were evaluated to assess the positional accuracy achieved through RTK-supported processing and GCP-based georectification, with each flight mode evaluated separately. Fixed-height flight planning resulted in lower spatial accuracy than terrain-follow mode, indicating that maintaining a constant flight height over irregular topography reduces spatial resolution due to variable image scales. It was also observed that it performs better in terms of key points per image and bundle block adjustment (BBA)-Average reprojection error in terrain-follow scenarios. In terms of 3D positional accuracy, using a limited number of GCPs resulted in root mean square error (RMSE) values of approximately 1–2 cm in the horizontal and 2–3 cm in the vertical components. However, the RTK-supported flights exhibited higher errors in the Z component, with values of 12.18 cm for the fixed-height and 6.85 cm for the terrain-follow flights.