The dependence of tool overhang on surface quality and tool wear in the turning process


Kıyak M., Kaner B., Şahin İ., Aldemır B., Cakir O.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, cilt.51, ss.431-438, 2010 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 51
  • Basım Tarihi: 2010
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s00170-010-2654-y
  • Dergi Adı: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.431-438
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Tool overhang, Surface roughness, Tool wear, Tool deflection, ROUGHNESS PREDICTION, STABILITY
  • Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

In the turning process, the importance of machining parameter choice is increased, as it controls the surface quality required. Tool overhang is a cutting tool parameter that has not been investigated in as much detail as some of the better known ones. It is appropriate to keep the tool overhang as short as possible; however, a longer tool overhang may be required depending on the geometry of the workpiece and when using the hole-turning process in particular. In this study, we investigate the effects of changes in the tool overhang in the external turning process on both the surface quality of the workpiece and tool wear. For this purpose, we used workpieces of AISI 1050 material with diameters of 20, 30, and 40 mm; and the surface roughness of the workpiece and tool wear were determined through experiments using constant cutting speed and feed rates with different depth of cuts (DOCs) and tool overhangs. We observed that the effect of the DOC on the surface roughness is negligible, but tool overhang is more important. The deflection of the cutting tool increases with tool overhang. Two different analytical methods were compared to determine the dependence of tool deflection on the tool overhang. Also, the real tool deflection values were determined using a comparator. We observed that the tool deflection values were quite compatible with the tool deflection results obtained using the second analytical method.