How to Conduct a Metaevaluation?: A Metaevaluation Practice
THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PROGRAM EVALUATION/LA REVUE CANADIENNE D'EVALUATION DE PROGRAMME, cilt.38, sa.1, ss.57-78, 2023 (ESCI, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 38 Sayı: 1
- Basım Tarihi: 2023
- Doi Numarası: 10.3138/cjpe.71619
- Dergi Adı: THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PROGRAM EVALUATION/LA REVUE CANADIENNE D'EVALUATION DE PROGRAMME
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, EBSCO Education Source, Political Science Complete, Psycinfo, Public Administration Abstracts
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.57-78
- Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
- Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
A metaevaluation is a quality cross-check to examine the conduct of an evaluation and validate the results. Of the few metaevaluation studies, almost none have reported on the metaevaluation procedure through a practical example evaluation. This study reports on the strengths and weaknesses of a program evaluation study in terms of the four main standards: utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy. It includes a metaevaluation process that involves both quantitative and qualitative analysis of data from eight meta-evaluators. It was found that while the evaluation study had very good utility and accuracy standards, the feasibility and propriety standards were only fair.