Examination of Mechanical Properties and Cost Impact of Thermoset Composites Produced with Different Manufacturing Methods in the Production of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Wing Skins


Sayın F. E., Altınbay A., Ünal A.

5th International 5 Ocak Congress on Applied Sciences , Adana, Türkiye, 5 - 06 Ocak 2024, ss.56-57

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Adana
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Türkiye
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.56-57
  • Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The increased demand in production quantities in the aviation, transportation, and defense

industries has led to the significant prominence of composite materials in the sector due to their

technical capabilities. The effects of changes in production methods of preferred composite

materials due to their mechanical properties will be examined in the manufacturing of aircraft

components. In this context, optimal technical capabilities and cost analyses will be investigated

for the production routes to be used during the project initiation, prototype, and transition to

mass production phases in aviation. The study includes thermoset matrix carbon fibers and glass

fibers used in the manufacturing of unmanned aerial vehicle wing shells, incorporating

autoclaves and oven devices. In the production process, 18 samples were produced using the

lay-up method of dry and prepreg fabrics, and their mechanical tests were conducted under

pressurized and normal atmospheric conditions. It is anticipated that the mechanical properties

of the samples produced with carbon fiber prepreg fabric and cured under pressure will yield

results at least 20% higher compared to other sample types. In the cost analysis, it was

calculated that the sample produced with the same experimental type is 28% cheaper than the

sample produced with dry carbon fiber fabric using the wet lay-up method. Considering the

technical requirements of product in the transition from prototype manufacturing to mass

production of composite materials used in UAV systems, it was determined that in the prototype

process, Sample 6 (GFW8 WUD) achieves the optimal benefit/cost ratio, while in the mass

production process, taking into account payload, flight time, and loads during flight, Sample 1

(CAP8 WUD) will be used despite the increase in costs.