Cross-modality validation of quantitative 90Y imaging using a custom hepatopulmonary shunt phantom and patient data


YEYİN N., Abuqbeitah M., DEMİR M., Akyol S., Kayaokay D. T., KESMEZACAR F. F., ...Daha Fazla

Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Kısa Makale
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s00411-026-01236-5
  • Dergi Adı: Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, Compendex, EMBASE, Environment Index, INSPEC, MEDLINE, Natural Science Collection (ProQuest), Biological Science Database (ProQuest), Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition (EBSCO), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest), Pharma Collection (ProQuest)
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: 90Y microsphere therapy, 90Y PET/CT dosimetry, 90Y PET/MR dosimetry, 90Y SPECT/CT dosimetry
  • Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

In this study the discrepancies in dose estimations from a 90Y-filled hepatopulmonary shunt phantom (HPSP) were analyzed using SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MR modalities. The dose variability was also evaluated among randomly selected individuals undergoing 90Y-microsphere therapy. The HPSP comprised a right lung of 1,101 cm³, a left lung of 863 cm³, a healthy liver parenchyma of 690 cm³, and two intrahepatic tumours of 202 cm³ and 9.5 cm³. 90Y-chloride activity was diluted in water and injected into the phantom. SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MR were acquired with the phantom immersed in water. Absorbed dose was calculated for phantom compartments and for patients with liver tumours who were treated with 90Y-glass microspheres. The calculated lung shunt fraction (LSF) (12.0%) from the PET/MR images was closest to the actual LSF (11.03%), followed by PET/CT with 12.2% and SPECT/CT with 13.4% LSF. The deviation between the actual dose estimates and 90Y-PET/MR was − 0.1% for the large tumour (202 cm³), -10.5% for the small tumour (9.5 cm³), -7.5% for the healthy liver parenchyma, and 6.1% for the lung. For 90Y-PET/CT, the deviation was 4.8% for the large tumour, -7.5% for the small tumour, -15.5% for the healthy liver parenchyma, and 7.6% for the lung. In contrast, a significant disparity was observed in the 90Y-SPECT/CT modality, with deviations of -6.3% for the large tumour, -65.3% for the small tumour, -10.7% for the healthy liver parenchyma, and 18.2% for the lung. In the patient study, the doses from 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and 90Y-PET/MR images were comparable, whereas 90Y-SPECT/CT yielded significantly lower dose estimates. The findings obtained demonstrate that 90Y-SPECT/CT generates significant inaccuracies in absorbed dose estimates mainly for small tumours. All modalities overestimated LSF and lung dose by less than 10% except SPECT/CT (18%). It is concluded that implementing an optimal imaging technique with robust scatter correction would mitigate the dose underestimate. 90Y-PET/CT and 90Y-PET/MR are the preferred methods for reliable dosimetry and precise dose–response assessment, especially owing to their robust correlation with 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT simulation.