Systematic evaluation of the aggregate types and properties on metakaolin based geopolymer composites


Creative Commons License

Şahin F., Uysal M. , Canpolat O.

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, vol.278, no.122414, pp.1-17, 2021 (Journal Indexed in SCI Expanded)

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 278 Issue: 122414
  • Publication Date: 2021
  • Doi Number: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122414
  • Journal Name: CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Aerospace Database, CAB Abstracts, Communication Abstracts, INSPEC, Metadex, Veterinary Science Database, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Page Numbers: pp.1-17

Abstract

Although aggregates constitute the largest volume in geopolymer composites, there are limited studies related to this parameter. This study investigates the effect of different types of aggregates on the mechanical and durability properties of metakaolin (MK) based geopolymer composites. For this study, while using metakaolin as the main raw material, slag (S) was used to gain an early setting. Six different sand types (silica sand, river sand, sandstone, Rilem sand, waste concrete aggregate, and basalt sand) were used in the geopolymer mortar. The ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) and flexural and compressive strength results of 7, 28, and 56 days were found to examine the effect of aggregates, while the unit weight, voids ratio, water absorption, and workability properties of the samples were also investigated. XRD analyzes were performed for the crystalline materials’ structure. After 56 days, the samples were exposed to 180 cycles of the freezing-thawing test (1 cycle consists of 12 h at 18 C and 12 h at +4 C) and high temperatures of 200, 400, 600, and 800 C. After the tests, UPV and strength results were found and weight changes were also examined. Also, an abrasion test was applied. SEM analyzes were carried out pre and post the high-temperature test. Test results have shown that basalt sand added sam- ples produced better results due to their more dense and compact structure compared to other aggre- gates. Similarly, high results were obtained by using silica sand and sandstone. In the case of using waste concrete aggregate, it was seen that acceptable results were obtained in terms of structural features.